Prediction of Noah Rubin [734th] vs Kyle Kang [695th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L W L L
Form
W L W W W L W L W LH2H: Rubin 1 - 0 Kang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rubin winning 2 and Kang winning 0. The last match between Rubin and Kang was at the Indian Wells 1 Challenger, 14-01-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Noah Rubin getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Noah Rubin | 1 |
| Kyle Kang | 0 |
| Rubin | Stats | Kang |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 734 | Ranking | 695 |
| 125 | Highest Rank | 591 |
| 29 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (215-169) | Career Total W/L | 54% (61-51) |
| $398,175 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Noah Rubin
Player
Kyle Kang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:9:5 | Average Match Time | 1:9:5 |
| 76% (39/51) | 1st Serve % | 48% (23/48) |
| 79% (31/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (14/23) |
| 58% (7/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (14/25) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 42% (20/48) | Return Points Win % | 25% (13/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Noah Rubin vs Kyle Kang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rubin 1 - 0 Kang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rubin has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Kang has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rubin, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kang has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rubin has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kang has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rubin has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kang winning 62.07% (W/L 18/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rubin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 59/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 113/ 92). Kang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rubin winning 1 times and Kang being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Rubin winning 2 and Kang winning 0. The last match between Rubin and Kang was at the Indian Wells 1 Challenger, 14-01-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Noah Rubin getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:5.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rubin and Kang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Rubin winning 0 times and Kang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Rubin winning 0, and Kang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rubin has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kang has played against players with an average rank of 454.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rubin has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kang has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rubin has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kang has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Noah Rubin vs Kyle Kang Best Odds For The Match
Noah Rubin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Noah Rubin
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
9
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
1-6 7-6(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Noah Rubin
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Matija Pecotic
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
46 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Noah Rubin
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Peter Bertran
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Tracy
Player
Noah Rubin
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
78%
(
83 of
106)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
52 of
83)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-4 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Kyle Kang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Noah Rubin
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
83
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Vadym Ursu
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kyle Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Kyle Kang
55%
(
65 of
118)
1st Serve %
50%
(
60 of
121)
13
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
58%
(
31 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
37 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
121)
124
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
80
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Kyle Kang
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
60%
(
73 of
121)
1st Serve %
64%
(
78 of
121)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
48 of
78)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
121)
127
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Kyle Kang
62%
(
72 of
117)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
45 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Alexander Kotzen
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
3-6 6-0 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Ryan Fishback
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
78%
(
57 of
73)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gavin Young
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Colin Sinclair
51%
(
38 of
75)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
92)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 6-7(4) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Rubin vs Kang?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Rubin Vs Kang is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (215/169) | Win/Loss | 54% (61/51) |
| 54% (484/408) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (136/120) |
| 51% (4319/4110) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1263/1206) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1080 | Aces Total | 233 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 940 | Total Double Faults | 188 |
| 1:15:29 | Average Match Time | 1:38:11 |
| 543.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 454.15 |
| 60% (13176/21888) | 1st Serve % | 59% (4145/7027) |
| 68% (8955/13176) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2756/4145) |
| 50% (4394/8712) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1478/2882) |
| 43% (894/2089) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (295/720) |
| 39% (8443/21613) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2840/7002) |
| 57% (207/363) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (58/108) |
| 29% (5/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 57% (63/110) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (16/33) |
| 57% (61/107) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (16/30) |
| 83% (218/182) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (56/48) |
| 17% (218/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (56/8) |
| 19% (166/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (56/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
